Legal Battle Intensifies as Perkins Coie Challenges Trump’s Executive Order
The legal firm Perkins Coie has taken a bold step against the Trump administration by filing a lawsuit claiming that a recent executive order unfairly targets the firm. This move comes as the firm argues that the administration’s actions are a response to Perkins Coie’s representation of clients with opposing views.
Recently, President Trump issued an executive order titled “Addressing Risks from Perkins Coie LLP”. In this order, the firm is accused of engaging in “dishonest and dangerous activity,” with allegations of attempting to overturn laws and elections. Furthermore, the order criticizes the firm for alleged racial discrimination within its diversity, equity, and inclusion programs.
In response, Perkins Coie filed a lawsuit in Washington D.C.’s federal court, describing the executive order as “an affront to the Constitution and our adversarial system of justice.” The firm argues that the order’s intent is to intimidate those who express views contrary to the administration’s perspectives, affecting both paying and pro bono clients.
According to the lawsuit, the executive order threatens Perkins Coie’s operational capacity and its client representation abilities. Consequently, the firm is seeking judicial intervention to nullify the order. As of now, the Justice Department has not commented on the matter.
Trump’s order further accuses Perkins Coie of engaging in activities that allegedly jeopardize democratic elections and the integrity of U.S. judicial and law enforcement systems. Notably, the firm’s association with Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and its role in crafting a controversial dossier on Trump-Russia connections are highlighted.
The lawsuit counters these claims, referencing a 2022 lawsuit by Trump against Perkins Coie, Hillary Clinton, and others, which was dismissed by a federal court. The firm also points out that the attorneys involved in the Clinton campaign no longer work with Perkins Coie. Among them, Michael Sussmann faced charges related to the dossier but was acquitted by a jury.
Additionally, Trump’s order accuses the firm of racial bias due to its diversity initiatives. Perkins Coie refutes this, asserting its commitment to diversity and inclusion without discriminatory practices against its staff.
Perkins Coie’s legal team argues that the executive order is unconstitutional, citing violations of the First, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments.
This article was originally written by www.npr.org
Be First to Comment